Re: [PATCH 2/2] t/README: Document the Smoke testing

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 21:04, A Large Angry SCM [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 08/02/2010 04:54 PM, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:

quoted

Can't we run this somewhere a little less "shabby"?

"shabby" is not a good word to describe a service somebody volunteered to
maintain for the public good.  Be civil, please.

quoted

And what's on the site tells us almost nothing about the tested systems.

Can you be more specific? What information do you find lacking at
http://smoke.git.nix.is/app/projects/smoke_reports/1 ?

"Platform Linux" does not tell much about the tested systems, no?

Heya,

On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 17:44, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

"shabby" is not a good word to describe a service somebody volunteered to
maintain for the public good.  Be civil, please.

That's why I quoted it, I didn't mean to put Ævar's work down and I
think he understood what I meant, judging from his reply. On that
note, thanks Ævar for reading what I meant, not what I said :).

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier