Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Make the Git tests emit TAP format

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Make the Git tests emit TAP format

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:58

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 22:10, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 21:49, Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] wrote:
I'll re-submit a version of the patch with a better commit message
which addresses all of the below.
Since the series just made it into pu is that still wanted or needed?
It very much is.  There isn't that much difference between being in 'pu'
and being in the mailing list archive.  Queuing in 'pu' is just to help me
not to forget about the series, nothing more.  Depending on how further
discussions go, the series can be replaced with an improvement or even can
be dropped as a whole as unusable.

In this case, the explanation in the commit messages and/or documentation
are found to be lacking, and you already know what the improved version
should look like, so I think it makes sense to replace the series with a
new version (v3?)

Thanks.

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Make the Git tests emit TAP format

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:48:58

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 03:08, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 22:10, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 21:49, Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] wrote:
I'll re-submit a version of the patch with a better commit message
which addresses all of the below.
Since the series just made it into pu is that still wanted or needed?
It very much is.  There isn't that much difference between being in 'pu'
and being in the mailing list archive.  Queuing in 'pu' is just to help me
not to forget about the series, nothing more.  Depending on how further
discussions go, the series can be replaced with an improvement or even can
be dropped as a whole as unusable.

In this case, the explanation in the commit messages and/or documentation
are found to be lacking, and you already know what the improved version
should look like, so I think it makes sense to replace the series with a
new version (v3?)
Thanks for the explanation. I'll submit an better version of it soon.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help