Re: [RFC][PATCH] Print the usage string on stdout instead of stderr.

Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:

Well sure it is, just as I wrote. So do you suggest that the file handle
should depend on the use case? Care to implement?

Thanks for your comments.  I will fix my patch accordingly and resend it.

Cheers,
Giuseppe

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano [off-list ref] wrote:

Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Well sure it is, just as I wrote. So do you suggest that the file handle
should depend on the use case? Care to implement?

Thanks for your comments.  I will fix my patch accordingly and resend it.

While you're at it, please take a look at

  http://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/SubmittingPatches

for your next re-send.

-- 
Cheers,
Ray Chuan