Jeenu V [off-list ref] writes:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[...]
It could be that you have a tag and a branch that are both named a.b.c,
though.
Hm, right. But I'm getting this from an existing local repo of mine. I
can't see any tags; 'git tag -l' is empty. Is there any more info that
I can provide?
man git-for-each-ref?
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Jeenu V [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[...]
It could be that you have a tag and a branch that are both named a.b.c,
though.
Hm, right. But I'm getting this from an existing local repo of mine. I
can't see any tags; 'git tag -l' is empty. Is there any more info that
I can provide?
man git-for-each-ref?
It does list all refs that I know of, but I don't see any duplicate entries.
--
:J
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 5:25 PM, Jeenu V [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 4:29 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Jeenu V [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 3:56 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
[...]
It could be that you have a tag and a branch that are both named a.b.c,
though.
Hm, right. But I'm getting this from an existing local repo of mine. I
can't see any tags; 'git tag -l' is empty. Is there any more info that
I can provide?
man git-for-each-ref?
It does list all refs that I know of, but I don't see any duplicate entries.
Ah, I think I get what happened here: I had used git update-ref, which
turned out to be used wrongly. My intention was to update a.b.c to a
new ref, but I used it 'git update-ref XXXXXX', rather than 'git
update-ref refs/heads/a.b.c XXXXXX'. The wrong usage created
.git/a.b.c and I guess this was causing the warning.
--
:J