[RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful

Subsystems: the rest

DORMANTno replies

5 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

[RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful

From: Mark Rada <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:18

In the first block of checks to validate a snapshot request, the last
check is never executed because the second last check is a superset of
the last check.

This change will switch the order of the last two checks, it has the
advantage of giving clients a more specific reason why they cannot get
a specific snapshot format instead of giving them the more generic
response.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rada <redacted>
---
 gitweb/gitweb.perl |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
index 4a42f61..7068db2 100755
--- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
+++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
@@ -5174,10 +5174,10 @@ sub git_snapshot {
 		die_error(400, "Invalid snapshot format parameter");
 	} elsif (!exists($known_snapshot_formats{$format})) {
 		die_error(400, "Unknown snapshot format");
-	} elsif (!grep($_ eq $format, @snapshot_fmts)) {
-		die_error(403, "Unsupported snapshot format");
 	} elsif ($known_snapshot_formats{$format}{'disabled'}) {
 		die_error(403, "Snapshot format not allowed");
+	} elsif (!grep($_ eq $format, @snapshot_fmts)) {
+		die_error(403, "Unsupported snapshot format");
 	}
 
 	if (!defined $hash) {
-- 
Mark A Rada (ferrous26)
marada@uwaterloo.ca

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful

From: Sam Vilain <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:18

Mark Rada wrote:
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful
Suspenders?  Really?

Sam

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful

From: Mark Rada <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:18

On 23/08/09 6:10 PM, Sam Vilain wrote:
Mark Rada wrote:
quoted
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful
Suspenders?  Really?

Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Context:

On 21/08/09 5:43 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Mark A Rada [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Unless I missed a case, the tests show that the extra condition check
that was added in the &git_snapshot routine is never actually executed,
because a disabled snapshot format is not added to @snapshot_fmts, which
is checked first.

snippet:
5178     } elsif (!grep($_ eq $format, @snapshot_fmts)) {
5179         die_error(403, "Unsupported snapshot format");
5180     } elsif ($known_snapshot_formats{$format}{'disabled'}) {
5181         die_error(403, "Snapshot format not allowed");
5182     }
5183
True; filter_snapshot_fmts looks at 'disabled' first.

I do not mind keeping these two lines as belt-and-suspender, though.

Yup...I couldn't think of an appropriate title and I expect this
patch to be edited (for another reason) or thrown out anyways.



-- 
Mark A Rada (ferrous26)
marada@uwaterloo.ca

Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful

From: Sam Vilain <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:18

Mark Rada wrote:
quoted
quoted
Subject: [RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: make suspenders more useful
      
Suspenders?  Really?
    
Context:

On 21/08/09 5:43 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
  
quoted
I do not mind keeping these two lines as belt-and-suspender, though.
    
Yup...I couldn't think of an appropriate title and I expect this
patch to be edited (for another reason) or thrown out anyways.
  
Please don't do that.  Use of metaphors makes the code harder to follow,
especially for non-native speakers.  In this case you confused me, a
British/NZ native speaker because you only used half of the idiom; so
all I was left with was a word which in the English where I speak refers
to a piece of clothing worn most often by prostitutes and people at the
Rocky Horror Picture Show.

Can I suggest "snapshot error handling" as a more neutral term...
Sam

[RFC/PATCH 1/3] gitweb: improve snapshot error handling

From: Mark Rada <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:18

Ok, this is just a resend of the first patch in my set from
earlier, but with some of the commit message reworded, namely
the subject (as suggested by Sam Vilain).

--
Mark Rada (ferrous26)
marada@uwaterloo.ca


--->8---
In the second block of checks to validate a snapshot request, the last
check is never executed because the second last check is a superset of
the last check.

This change will switch the order of the last two checks, it has the
advantage of giving clients a more specific reason why they cannot get
a snapshot format if the format they have chosen is disabled.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rada <redacted>
---
 gitweb/gitweb.perl |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gitweb/gitweb.perl b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
index 4a42f61..7068db2 100755
--- a/gitweb/gitweb.perl
+++ b/gitweb/gitweb.perl
@@ -5174,10 +5174,10 @@ sub git_snapshot {
 		die_error(400, "Invalid snapshot format parameter");
 	} elsif (!exists($known_snapshot_formats{$format})) {
 		die_error(400, "Unknown snapshot format");
-	} elsif (!grep($_ eq $format, @snapshot_fmts)) {
-		die_error(403, "Unsupported snapshot format");
 	} elsif ($known_snapshot_formats{$format}{'disabled'}) {
 		die_error(403, "Snapshot format not allowed");
+	} elsif (!grep($_ eq $format, @snapshot_fmts)) {
+		die_error(403, "Unsupported snapshot format");
 	}
 
 	if (!defined $hash) {
-- 
1.6.4
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help