From: Michael Bergin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:06
Is there a library containing just the option and subcommand
processing code from git? I saw a post about gitopt but can't find a
project with that name. If not is there any problem with me doing
this? Thanks.
- Mike Bergin
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:06
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Michael Bergin wrote:
Is there a library containing just the option and subcommand processing
code from git? I saw a post about gitopt but can't find a project with
that name.
The "library" is contained in the files parse-options.[ch] in git.git. I
am unsure if you need strbuf.c, too, or not.
If not is there any problem with me doing this?
Not if you abide by the license of git.git, which is GPLv2.
Ciao,
Dscho
From: Michael Bergin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:06
Thanks for the pointers. I also want to create a generic library for
command facades like git. For that I will probably use git.c as a
guide but to make it generic I would need to add/rearrange code.
GPLv2 works fine for my purposes. I hope this isn't an offensive
question or anything but would releasing just the library under LGPL
be considered?
On Jul 25, 2009, at 12:32 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Michael Bergin wrote:
quoted
Is there a library containing just the option and subcommand
processing
code from git? I saw a post about gitopt but can't find a project
with
that name.
The "library" is contained in the files parse-options.[ch] in
git.git. I
am unsure if you need strbuf.c, too, or not.
quoted
If not is there any problem with me doing this?
Not if you abide by the license of git.git, which is GPLv2.
Ciao,
Dscho
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:06
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Michael Bergin wrote:
Thanks for the pointers. I also want to create a generic library for
command facades like git. For that I will probably use git.c as a guide
but to make it generic I would need to add/rearrange code. GPLv2 works
fine for my purposes. I hope this isn't an offensive question or
anything but would releasing just the library under LGPL be considered?
You need to ask all authors of all the code you reuse. I, for one, have
no objections.
Ciao,
Dscho
From: Michael Bergin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:47:06
I really appreciate your help. I'm going to do this regardless of
license so I'll ask about that when I have a finished project. Let me
know if you have any suggestions for features, etc. Thanks again.
- Mike Bergin
On Jul 25, 2009, at 7:18 PM, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 25 Jul 2009, Michael Bergin wrote:
quoted
Thanks for the pointers. I also want to create a generic library for
command facades like git. For that I will probably use git.c as a
guide
but to make it generic I would need to add/rearrange code. GPLv2
works
fine for my purposes. I hope this isn't an offensive question or
anything but would releasing just the library under LGPL be
considered?
You need to ask all authors of all the code you reuse. I, for one,
have
no objections.
Ciao,
Dscho