Re: [egit-dev] Re: [EGIT PATCH] Rename org.spearce.egit -> org.eclipse.egit
From: Mark Struberg <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:58
Hmm, as an eclipse-plugin-prog dummy, I can't see so much problems around. The old binaries are still there. The new binaries are essentially a new scm plugin. Where do they interfere? They will have new names, config sections, etc isn't? We could also ship an update to the old plugin introducing a clear name 'SpearceGit' or something. So it can easily be distinguished for those who need old projects in parallel. In a few months time from now, almost all people will only have the new org.eclipse plugin installed. And thus who have both old and new plugins installed should know how to select the proper one that way. LieGrue, strub
--- Alex Blewitt <alex.blewitt@gmail.com> schrieb am Fr, 19.6.2009:
Von: Alex Blewitt [off-list ref] Betreff: Re: [egit-dev] Re: [EGIT PATCH] Rename org.spearce.egit -> org.eclipse.egit An: "EGit developer discussion" [off-list ref] CC: "Robin Rosenberg" <redacted>, "git@vger.kernel.org" <redacted>, "egit-dev@eclipse.org" <redacted> Datum: Freitag, 19. Juni 2009, 10:47 One possibility is to provide a compatibility bundle such that the old API subclasses the refactored classses. That way, existing projects will continue to work. However, it is quite likely to be difficult to do it with 100% success so another option might be to provide an upgrade option, only visible to the older projects , which will do the change in place. But since it's a fairly major change, and that people will have to go somewhere else to get the plugins etc, it is probably a more efficient use of time to just make a note in the release notes about the change and let people upgrade themselves. Alex Sent from my (new) iPhone On 19 Jun 2009, at 00:24, "Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Robin Rosenberg [off-list ref]wrote:quoted
quoted
Need an idea on how to proceed here. There is aproblem related to updatingquoted
quoted
plugins here. We have renamed feature with oneunrenamed plugin. Howquoted
quoted
to we avoid problem when switching fromorg.spearce to org.eclipsequoted
quoted
One option is to release a v0.4.1 (which we shoulddo anyway), which is the lastquoted
quoted
version from master before the split. Fortechnical reasons this will bequoted
quoted
a branch since the split occurred already. That 0.4.1 feature should require jgit < 0.5.Then we jgit to v0.5 andquoted
quoted
make org.eclipse.egit require jgit >= 0.5 Having two EGit features will be confusing. Youget two of everything. E.g.quoted
quoted
Team>Share will have two Git's to choose from,but you cannot tell whichquoted
quoted
is which. That said, having both could be a feature, sinceit (didn't really try it), wouldquoted
quoted
be possible to switch between new and oldworkspaces and get the pluginquoted
quoted
configured for that workspace. The wierdness makeme suggest we doquoted
quoted
not do this. If we really want it we could chooseto create a proxy pluginquoted
quoted
for attaching old workspaces to the new plugins.Yikes. I didn't even consider this. My ownworkspaces freaked outquoted
at the change, but I just deleted the projects fromthe workspace,quoted
re-imported them, and re-attached them to the new teamprovider.quoted
I never even gave it a second thought. You're right, we should have a better plan forexisting deployments.quoted
Its a good thing I didn't just shove this into thetree, even thoughquoted
it seemed simple on the surface. Toosimple. :-)quoted
I like the 0.5 cut to define jgit versions pre/postsplit. But I'mquoted
really not sure what to do about the rename on theEGit team providerquoted
for existing workspaces. --Shawn. _______________________________________________ egit-dev mailing list egit-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/egit-dev-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html