Re: Bug(let): status reports 'can fast-forward' when not true

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: Bug(let): status reports 'can fast-forward' when not true

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:38

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
[cc'ing Kjetil, as this is a fallout of 19de5d6]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:53:52PM +0100, Charles Bailey wrote:
quoted
I was not really thinking when I get fetched, and ran git status on my
pu branch. I was told that pu was behind origin/pu by 104 commits and
could be fast-forwarded, so I git merged origin/pu and was mildly
surprised when git merge made a commit for me.

A quick investigation revealed that pu had (of course) been rewound,
but the only commits that it had that the new pu didn't, were merge
commits.
I think this is an unintended consequence of 19de5d6
(stat_tracking_info(): only count real commits, 2009-03-04). It is
perhaps more useful when seeing the actual numbers to see only the count
of real commits, but it makes statements like "can be fast-forwarded" no
longer true.

So I think we need to either:

  1. reword the "can be fast-forwarded" text to something else

  2. revert 19de5d6, since merge commits _can_ be interesting

  3. refactor stat_tracking_info to return "real" and "merge" counts,
     and change the text for the case of "real == 0 && merge > 0".

-Peff
Let's revert it for now and then try #3 after 1.6.3 final.

Re: Bug(let): status reports 'can fast-forward' when not true

From: Kjetil Barvik <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:38

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
[cc'ing Kjetil, as this is a fallout of 19de5d6]

On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 09:53:52PM +0100, Charles Bailey wrote:
quoted
I was not really thinking when I get fetched, and ran git status on my
pu branch. I was told that pu was behind origin/pu by 104 commits and
could be fast-forwarded, so I git merged origin/pu and was mildly
surprised when git merge made a commit for me.

A quick investigation revealed that pu had (of course) been rewound,
but the only commits that it had that the new pu didn't, were merge
commits.
I think this is an unintended consequence of 19de5d6
(stat_tracking_info(): only count real commits, 2009-03-04). It is
perhaps more useful when seeing the actual numbers to see only the count
of real commits, but it makes statements like "can be fast-forwarded" no
longer true.

So I think we need to either:

  1. reword the "can be fast-forwarded" text to something else

  2. revert 19de5d6, since merge commits _can_ be interesting

  3. refactor stat_tracking_info to return "real" and "merge" counts,
     and change the text for the case of "real == 0 && merge > 0".

-Peff
Let's revert it for now and then try #3 after 1.6.3 final.
  OK.  

  Then I have some time thinking about a solution.  Maybe:

  4. Introduce an argument "--no-merges", and then only show real
     commits when used.

  -- kjetil
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help