We must retain the TOPO and COMMIT_TIME_DESC rules when we add in
BOUNDARY for a thin pack, otherwise the resulting thin pack won't
match the expected ordering.
Its a non-critical error to sort the pack wrong, but it may cause the
client to skip around the pack data more frequently during access.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <redacted>
---
.../src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java b/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java
index f9945c4..b878409 100644
--- a/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java
+++ b/org.spearce.jgit/src/org/spearce/jgit/lib/PackWriter.java
@@ -765,10 +765,10 @@ private ObjectWalk setUpWalker(
throws MissingObjectException, IOException,
IncorrectObjectTypeException {
final ObjectWalk walker = new ObjectWalk(db);
- walker.sort(RevSort.TOPO, true);
+ walker.sort(RevSort.TOPO);
walker.sort(RevSort.COMMIT_TIME_DESC, true);
if (thin)
- walker.sort(RevSort.BOUNDARY);
+ walker.sort(RevSort.BOUNDARY, true);
for (ObjectId id : interestingObjects) {
RevObject o = walker.parseAny(id);--
1.6.2.288.gc3f22