Yesss! sourceforge.net and Git
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Hi, check this out: http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git Ciao, Dscho
9 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Hi, check this out: http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git Ciao, Dscho
From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Heya, On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git
About time! Totally awesome though. Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;) -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
From: Grzegorz Kossakowski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Johannes Schindelin pisze:
Hi, check this out: http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git
Great news. I have some more. At Apache we are in the process of setting up official Git mirror of our SVN repository. It may sound like nothing really big but first step (even small) is important. We are already discussing how we could change our work-flow if we have more powerful tools in place. Personally, I would like to thank Git community for producing such great piece of software and supporting it here in very professional and vivid way. -- Best regards, Grzegorz Kossakowski
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Hi, On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/GitAbout time! Totally awesome though. Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;)
Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-) Ciao, Dscho
From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Heya, On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:01, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:quoted
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin wrote:quoted
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/Git
It seems there's a bunch of sillyness in there, such as them recommending backup over rsync?! They should be telling people to just make a clone, and in the case of a crash they can push the clone back up! Also, maybe we can tell them git learned how to clone empty repo's recently?
quoted
About time! Totally awesome though. Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;)Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-)
Heh, speaking of Hg, I heard they're adding DVCS support to code.google.com soon, if they're already adding a non-svn VCS, why not git? :D -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Hi, On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:01, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:quoted
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 22:38, Johannes Schindelin wrote:quoted
http://apps.sourceforge.net/trac/sitedocs/wiki/GitIt seems there's a bunch of sillyness in there, such as them recommending backup over rsync?! They should be telling people to just make a clone, and in the case of a crash they can push the clone back up! Also, maybe we can tell them git learned how to clone empty repo's recently?
It's not in any release yet, is it?
quoted
quoted
About time! Totally awesome though. Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;)Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-)Heh, speaking of Hg, I heard they're adding DVCS support to code.google.com soon, if they're already adding a non-svn VCS, why not git? :D
Well, you work in the shop. Lots of politics, my son, lots of politics. Ciao, Dscho
From: Felipe Contreras <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Sverre Rabbelier [off-list ref] wrote:
Heya, On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:01, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
On Sun, 1 Mar 2009, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:quoted
About time! Totally awesome though. Now, code.google.com and others have no excuse anymore, right? ;)Except that it is run by Subversion people, and therefore it by like asking git.or.cz to serve Mercurial repositories ;-)Heh, speaking of Hg, I heard they're adding DVCS support to code.google.com soon, if they're already adding a non-svn VCS, why not git? :D
Well, git has become so freakingly popular that supporting any DVCS that is not git would generate lots of complaints. -- Felipe Contreras
From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Heya, On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:07, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Also, maybe we can tell them git learned how to clone empty repo's recently?It's not in any release yet, is it?
True, that. But when it is we can? What with 1.6.2 soon-to-be-released and all?
Well, you work in the shop. Lots of politics, my son, lots of politics.
Yeah, it was mostly wishful thinking from my side. There's some work being done on git and hg interoperability though, so if worst comes to worst, I could live with using something like git-hg ;). -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier
From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:18
Heya, On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 23:10, Felipe Contreras [off-list ref] wrote:
Well, git has become so freakingly popular that supporting any DVCS that is not git would generate lots of complaints.
Hehe, since when have big company's ever bothered with 'lots of complaints'? ;) I mean, they're offering a free service, they can always hide behind "if you don't like it, use something else". -- Cheers, Sverre Rabbelier