From: Tim Visher <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:17
Hello Everyone,
I'm working on getting git 1.6.2-rc2 built. I have a bin, man, info,
and html directory in my home folder that I'd like to use as the
defaults for git. I attempted to do this through
make configure
./configure --XXdir=/full/path/to/dir
make all man info html
make install install-man install-info install-html
But other than the binaries (and I'm not even totally convinced they
got in correctly) and the man pages, everything else seems to be
attempting to go to the typical places in /usr/local.
What am I doing wrong?
--
In Christ,
Timmy V.
http://burningones.com/http://five.sentenc.es/ - Spend less time on e-mail
From: Jeff King <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:17
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:48:29AM -0500, Tim Visher wrote:
I'm working on getting git 1.6.2-rc2 built. I have a bin, man, info,
and html directory in my home folder that I'd like to use as the
defaults for git. I attempted to do this through
make configure
./configure --XXdir=/full/path/to/dir
make all man info html
make install install-man install-info install-html
But other than the binaries (and I'm not even totally convinced they
got in correctly) and the man pages, everything else seems to be
attempting to go to the typical places in /usr/local.
What am I doing wrong?
The configure support is notoriously incomplete (AFAIK, very few of the
active developers use it regularly). Probably you need something like
this (but I didn't test it):
From: Tim Visher <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:17
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
The configure support is notoriously incomplete
Would it be easier for me to just build the documentation and then
install it by hand then? Is that even possible?
--
In Christ,
Timmy V.
http://burningones.com/http://five.sentenc.es/ - Spend less time on e-mail
From: Jeff King <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:17
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Tim Visher wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
The configure support is notoriously incomplete
Would it be easier for me to just build the documentation and then
install it by hand then? Is that even possible?
No, there's Makefile support:
make htmldir=/path/to/wherever install-html
but the autoconf stuff wasn't hooking into it properly (which is what
the patch I sent should do).
What I meant by "incomplete" is that most people just use the Makefile
directly without autoconf, so we never notice when bugs like this are
hiding. Thus the bugs tend to hang around for a while until somebody
submits a patch (which I was hoping you would do after getting it to
work).
-Peff