Really slow 'git gc'

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:14

Ok, so I was wondering why doing a 'git gc' on my kernel backup on one of 
the linux-foundation machines was taking so long, and I think I've found a 
performance problem.

The way I do kernel back-ups is that I just push to two different sites 
every once in a while (read: multiple times a day when I do lots of 
merging), and one of them is master.kernel.org that then gets published to 
others.

The other one is a linux-foundation machine that I have a login on, and 
that's my "secondary" back-up, in case both kernel.org and my own home 
machines were to be corrupted somehow. And because it's my secondary, I 
seldom then log in an gc anything, so it's a mess.

But it was _really_ slow when I finally did so today. The whole "Counting 
objects" phase was counting by hundreds, which it really shouldn't do on a 
fast machine.

The reason? Tons and tons of pack-files. But just the existence of the 
pack-files is not what killed it: things were _much_ faster if I just did 
a "git pack-objects" by hand. 

The real reason _seems_ to be the "--unpacked=pack-....pack" arguments. I 
literally had 232 pack-files, and it looks like a lot of the time was 
spent in that silly loop oer 'ignore_packed' in find_pack_entry(), when 
revision.c does that "has_sha1_pack()" thing. You get a O(n**2) effect in 
number of pack-files: for each commit we look over every pack-file, and 
for every pack-file we look at, we look over each ignore_pack entry.

I didn't really analyze this a lot, and now the thing is packed and much 
faster, but I thought I'd throw this out there..

		Linus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help