3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:12
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
In the name of consistency, I'd rather leave show-branch as it is.
Yes, Nana explained why I was wrong on this one.
However, IMO there is a much worse issue lurking: people might want to
_know_ what "@{-2}" would expand to, _without_ switching branches."git branch --history" anyone?
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:12
Hi, On Sun, 15 Feb 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:quoted
However, IMO there is a much worse issue lurking: people might want to _know_ what "@{-2}" would expand to, _without_ switching branches."git branch --history" anyone?
For a moment, you had me convinced it already exists, and I only understood after "git grep history builtin-branch.c" came up empty. ;-) Ciao, Dscho
From: Jay Soffian <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:12
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 5:41 AM, Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
"git branch --history" anyone?For a moment, you had me convinced it already exists, and I only understood after "git grep history builtin-branch.c" came up empty.
And I've labeled that mail as TODO. :-) j.