(unknown)

Subsystems: the rest

3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

(unknown)

From: <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:55

From 65c4fed27fe9752ffd0e3b7cb6807561a4dd4601 Mon Sep 17 00: 00:00 2001
From: Nathan W. Panike <redacted>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:53:43 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Get format-patch to show first commit after root commit

Currently, the command

git format-patch -1 e83c5163316f89bfbde

in the git repository creates an empty file.  Instead, one is
forced to do

git format-patch -1 --root e83c5163316f89bfbde

This seems arbitrary.  This patch fixes this case, so that

git format-patch -1 e83c5163316f89bfbde

will produce an actual patch.
---
 builtin-log.c |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-log.c b/builtin-log.c
index 4a02ee9..5e7b61f 100644
--- a/builtin-log.c
+++ b/builtin-log.c
@@ -977,6 +977,8 @@ int cmd_format_patch(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 		list[nr - 1] = commit;
 	}
 	total = nr;
+	if (total == 1 && !list[0]->parents)
+		rev.show_root_diff=1;
 	if (!keep_subject && auto_number && total > 1)
 		numbered = 1;
 	if (numbered)
-- 
1.6.1.76.gc123b.dirty

Re: [PATCH] Get format-patch to show first commit after root commit

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:55

Hi,

your mailing process has a problem; neither the recipients nor the subject 
made it into the mail header.

On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, nathan.panike@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
From 65c4fed27fe9752ffd0e3b7cb6807561a4dd4601 Mon Sep 17 00: 00:00 2001
From: Nathan W. Panike <redacted>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:53:43 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Get format-patch to show first commit after root commit

Currently, the command

git format-patch -1 e83c5163316f89bfbde
You do not need -1, and using 19 digits seems a bit arbitrary; the 
convention seems to be 7 digits (that is what --abbrev-commit does).
in the git repository creates an empty file.  Instead, one is
forced to do

git format-patch -1 --root e83c5163316f89bfbde

This seems arbitrary.  This patch fixes this case, so that

git format-patch -1 e83c5163316f89bfbde

will produce an actual patch.
IMHO mentioning --root is misleading, as the real bug is the empty diff.

Apart from that, I like the patch, though.

Thanks,
Dscho

Re: [PATCH] Get format-patch to show first commit after root commit

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:55

Hi,

On Sat, 10 Jan 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009, nathan.panike@gmail.com wrote:
quoted
quoted
From 65c4fed27fe9752ffd0e3b7cb6807561a4dd4601 Mon Sep 17 00: 00:00 2001
From: Nathan W. Panike <redacted>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:53:43 -0600
Subject: [PATCH] Get format-patch to show first commit after root commit

Currently, the command

git format-patch -1 e83c5163316f89bfbde
You do not need -1, and using 19 digits seems a bit arbitrary; the 
convention seems to be 7 digits (that is what --abbrev-commit does).
Sorry, the -1 is needed.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help