I notice the web interfaces to many git sites are very risky to just
click on. E.g., just clicking http://repo.or.cz/ sends megabytes to
the users browser. At least the homepage of such sites should be
something lighter in weight.
There are lots of reasons fore and against what your proposing, and
there is no good answer. Yes it sends a lot of data, but one could
argue - more data is better than less data.
- John 'Warthog9' Hawley
On Mon, 2008-12-29 at 13:03 +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
I notice the web interfaces to many git sites are very risky to just
click on. E.g., just clicking http://repo.or.cz/ sends megabytes to
the users browser. At least the homepage of such sites should be
something lighter in weight.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:50
jidanni@jidanni.org writes:
I notice the web interfaces to many git sites are very risky to just
click on. E.g., just clicking http://repo.or.cz/ sends megabytes to
the users browser. At least the homepage of such sites should be
something lighter in weight.
That is a bit of historical artifact. Currently the "index" page for
gitweb installation is 'projects_list' page with _all_ the projects
hosted. It is not split into pages, like for example 'log' or 'heads'
views are; there were some patches for that, but would have to be
redone as the area changed a bit since. It could have been replaced by
projects search page...
It is a bit of historical reason.
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland
ShadeHawk on #git
From: Anders Melchiorsen <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:50
Jakub Narebski wrote:
jidanni@jidanni.org writes:
quoted
I notice the web interfaces to many git sites are very risky to just
click on. E.g., just clicking http://repo.or.cz/ sends megabytes to
the users browser. At least the homepage of such sites should be
something lighter in weight.
That is a bit of historical artifact. Currently the "index" page for
gitweb installation is 'projects_list' page with _all_ the projects
hosted. It is not split into pages, like for example 'log' or 'heads'
views are; there were some patches for that, but would have to be
redone as the area changed a bit since. It could have been replaced by
projects search page...
It is a bit of historical reason.
For the specific case of repo.or.cz, I guess that turning on HTTP
compression might help a lot.
Anders.
AM> For the specific case of repo.or.cz, I guess that turning on HTTP
AM> compression might help a lot.
It's the billion bytes to the innocents' browser that huts the most.
Bad to put such large homepages into browsers.