From: Junio C Hamano <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:27
Brandon Casey [off-list ref] writes:
Miklos Vajna wrote:
quoted
On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 07:07:54PM -0500, Brandon Casey [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
While we're at it, change the allocation to reference the variable it is
allocating memory for to try to prevent a similar mistake if the type is
changed in the future.
If this is really a problem, then I think it would be good to mention
this in Documentation/CodingGuidelines.
That's fine. Though I didn't mean to imply that the memory under-allocation
was caused by a change in variable type in this case. Re-reading my commit
message, maybe it sounds like that.
Yeah, it does. I was scratching my head and had to read the patch three
times until I got it (yes, I am especially slower than usual today, as the
reason I am reading mails right now is because I am jetlagged and cannot
sleep).
I didn't mean to imply that the memory under-allocation
was caused by a change in variable type in this case. Re-reading my commit
message, maybe it sounds like that.
Yeah, it does. I was scratching my head and had to read the patch three
times until I got it (yes, I am especially slower than usual today, as the
reason I am reading mails right now is because I am jetlagged and cannot
sleep).
If it's not too late, maybe this would make a better commit message:
--->8---
builtin-merge.c: allocate correct amount of memory
Fix two memory allocation errors which allocate space for a pointer rather
than enough space for the structure itself.
This:
struct commit_list *parent = xmalloc(sizeof(struct commit_list *));
should have been this:
struct commit_list *parent = xmalloc(sizeof(struct commit_list));
But while we're at it, change the allocation to reference the variable it is
allocating memory for to try to prevent a similar mistake, for example if the
type is changed, in the future.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <redacted>
From: Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:28
Brandon Casey [off-list ref] wrote:
Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Brandon Casey [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
I didn't mean to imply that the memory under-allocation
was caused by a change in variable type in this case. Re-reading my commit
message, maybe it sounds like that.
Yeah, it does. I was scratching my head and had to read the patch three
times until I got it (yes, I am especially slower than usual today, as the
reason I am reading mails right now is because I am jetlagged and cannot
sleep).
If it's not too late, maybe this would make a better commit message:
Nope, I didn't get around to the patch until now. Better message
is being used... ;-)
Thanks everyone.
--->8---
builtin-merge.c: allocate correct amount of memory
Fix two memory allocation errors which allocate space for a pointer rather
than enough space for the structure itself.
This:
struct commit_list *parent = xmalloc(sizeof(struct commit_list *));
should have been this:
struct commit_list *parent = xmalloc(sizeof(struct commit_list));
But while we're at it, change the allocation to reference the variable it is
allocating memory for to try to prevent a similar mistake, for example if the
type is changed, in the future.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Casey <redacted>