From: Giuseppe Bilotta <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:05
This patch enhances the tex funcname by adding support for
chapter and part sectioning commands. It also matches
the starred version of the sectioning commands.
---
I know that technically speaking this should have been two
separate patches because they are two logically separate
changes, but they are really rather braindead so please
accept them as one :)
diff.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
From: Giuseppe Bilotta <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:06
This patch enhances the tex funcname by adding support for
chapter and part sectioning commands. It also matches
the starred version of the sectioning commands.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <redacted>
---
Resend, with Signed-off-by: line
diff.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:06
Giuseppe Bilotta [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
This patch enhances the tex funcname by adding support for
chapter and part sectioning commands. It also matches
the starred version of the sectioning commands.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <redacted>
---
Resend, with Signed-off-by: line
diff.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
Ok on idea, but NAK on implementation.
"A\?" to mean 0 or one "A" in BRE is GNU extention and we try to avoid it.
"A\{0,1\}" is equivalent and we already use the bound notation in "java"
section, so perhaps this is an Ok replacement?
{ "tex", "^\\(\\\\\\(\\(sub\\)*section\\|chapter\\|part\\)\\*\\{0,1\\}{.*\\)$" },
From: Giuseppe Bilotta <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:06
This patch enhances the tex funcname by adding support for
chapter and part sectioning commands. It also matches
the starred version of the sectioning commands.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Bilotta <redacted>
---
As recommended by Junio, use \{0,1\} instead of \?
diff.c | 2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)