Re: theirs/ours was Re: [PATCH 6/6] Add a new test for using a custom merge strategy
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:04
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
"Sverre Rabbelier" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 22:20, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
"Sverre Rabbelier" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Mhhh, but the proposed strategy there was in response to the 'insane' git-merge-theirs version, not to the 'exact opposite of git-merge-ours' that I refer to now, yes?No.Nanako Shiraishi's patch was not in response to the "git-merge-theirs" thread, or I am missing something here....?The quoted sentence by me in that message was after I explained why "per hunk theirs" aka "-Xtheirs" was not such a great idea I further went on to say "by the way, '-s theirs' is even worse and here is why".
Heh, I ended up doing the "digging" myself. The quote came from this:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89010/focus=89024
and "tried not to sound too negative" there refers to:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/89010/focus=89021
which _was_ about the "-Xtheirs", not "-s theirs".