Re: git-scm.com

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: git-scm.com

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:02

I think counting merges in "The Authors of Git" statistics give quite
skewed numbers.  If you are generating it with "shortlog", you probably
would want to give --no-merges to the command line as well.  Also it
appears that you are not using .mailmap to avoid counting the same person
as different people.

I find a tabular list like this list easier to read if it were sorted like
this:

	A	D	G
        B	E	H
        C	F

i.e. not like this:

	A	B	C
        D	E	F
        G	H

Re: git-scm.com

From: Scott Chacon <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:02

Thanks Junio,

I fixed the things you mentioned here, except for the list ordering,
only because I kinda think you big contributors should be at the top
there, and also because it's slightly more difficult to populate an
html table that way :)  If everyone feels strongly about that, though,
I will change it.

Scott



On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 4:47 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
I think counting merges in "The Authors of Git" statistics give quite
skewed numbers.  If you are generating it with "shortlog", you probably
would want to give --no-merges to the command line as well.  Also it
appears that you are not using .mailmap to avoid counting the same person
as different people.

I find a tabular list like this list easier to read if it were sorted like
this:

       A       D       G
       B       E       H
       C       F

i.e. not like this:

       A       B       C
       D       E       F
       G       H
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help