Re: [PATCH 2/2] merge-recursive: respect core.autocrlf
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:43
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted hunk
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <redacted> --- builtin-merge-recursive.c | 8 ++++++++ t/t6033-merge-crlf.sh | 2 +- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)diff --git a/builtin-merge-recursive.c b/builtin-merge-recursive.c index 7643f17..edd023f 100644 --- a/builtin-merge-recursive.c +++ b/builtin-merge-recursive.c@@ -525,6 +525,7 @@ static void update_file_flags(const unsigned char *sha, enum object_type type; void *buf; unsigned long size; + struct strbuf strbuf; if (S_ISGITLINK(mode)) die("cannot read object %s '%s': It is a submodule!",@@ -535,6 +536,12 @@ static void update_file_flags(const unsigned char *sha, die("cannot read object %s '%s'", sha1_to_hex(sha), path); if (type != OBJ_BLOB) die("blob expected for %s '%s'", sha1_to_hex(sha), path); + strbuf_init(&strbuf, 0); + if (convert_to_working_tree(path, buf, size, &strbuf)) { + free(buf); + size = strbuf.len; + buf = strbuf_detach(&strbuf, NULL); + } if (make_room_for_path(path) < 0) { update_wd = 0;
Fairly straightforward fix, except that I suspect this needs to be done only for regular files and not symlinks. I think entry.c:write_entry() shows how this should be done.