Re: Switching branches without committing changes

3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: Switching branches without committing changes

From: Xavier Maillard <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:24

   Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

   > On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:06:47AM -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
   >
   >> Use `git checkout -m` to switch the branch anyway.  However, if
   >> there is a merge conflict while you are trying to carry the changes
   >> to the other branch you may be faced with a merge conflict you are
   >> not prepared to resolve, or simply cannot resolve in a reasonable
   >> period of time.
   >
   > Ah, for some reason I didn't think of '-m' in the advice I gave (I guess
   > I have just never used it). It is almost certainly simpler than using a
   > 'stash' at this point (but I do think stashing _beforehand_ still has
   > advantages).

   The thing is, that -m is really to mollify people who are _too_ accustomed
   to CVS/SVN update behaviour.  Over there, "scm update" does not give you
   any choice other than having to merge.

This post is *yet* another valuable candidate to put onto the wiki.

	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org

Re: Switching branches without committing changes

From: Joe Fiorini <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:25

Can you send me a link to the official wiki?  If I have access to it,  
I will see about updating it today.

-Joe

On Mar 22, 2008, at 9:00 PM, Xavier Maillard wrote:
  Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:06:47AM -0400, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
quoted
Use `git checkout -m` to switch the branch anyway.  However, if
there is a merge conflict while you are trying to carry the changes
to the other branch you may be faced with a merge conflict you are
not prepared to resolve, or simply cannot resolve in a reasonable
period of time.
Ah, for some reason I didn't think of '-m' in the advice I gave (I  
guess
I have just never used it). It is almost certainly simpler than  
using a
'stash' at this point (but I do think stashing _beforehand_ still has
advantages).
  The thing is, that -m is really to mollify people who are _too_  
accustomed
  to CVS/SVN update behaviour.  Over there, "scm update" does not  
give you
  any choice other than having to merge.

This post is *yet* another valuable candidate to put onto the wiki.

	Xavier
-- 
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org

Re: Switching branches without committing changes

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:25

On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 10:46:06AM -0400, Joe Fiorini wrote:
Can you send me a link to the official wiki?  If I have access to it, I 
will see about updating it today.
http://git.or.cz/gitwiki

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help