[PATCH v2] Make git prune remove temporary packs that look like write failures

Write errors when repacking (eg, due to out-of-space conditions)
can leave temporary packs (and possibly other files beginning
with "tmp_") lying around which no existing
codepath removes and which aren't obvious to the casual user.
These can also be multi-megabyte files wasting noticeable space.
Unfortunately there's no way to definitely tell in builtin-prune
that a tmp_ file is not being used by a concurrent process.
However, it is documented that pruning should only be done
on a quiet repository and --expire is honoured (using code
from Johannes Schindelin). The names of removed files are printed.

Signed-off-by: David Tweed (david.tweed@gmail.com)
---

This version incorporates all the agreed with changes from the
previous version, and since I was modifying the relevant
context lines it includes Johannes' code honouring --expire
(but not the test he wrote which is presumably best sent as a separate 
patch from him).

Hopefully this one won't get whitespace munged.

 builtin-prune.c |   39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/builtin-prune.c b/builtin-prune.c
index b5e7684..f25ddb6 100644
--- a/builtin-prune.c
+++ b/builtin-prune.c

@@ -83,6 +83,44 @@ static void prune_object_dir(const char *path)
 	}
 }

+/*
+ * Write errors (particularly out of space) can result in
+ * failed temporary packs (and more rarely indexes and other
+ * files begining with "tmp_") accumulating in the
+ * object directory.
+ */
+static void remove_temporary_files(void)
+{
+	DIR *dir;
+	struct dirent *de;
+	char* dirname=get_object_directory();
+
+	dir = opendir(dirname);
+	if (!dir) {
+		fprintf(stderr, "Unable to open object directory %s\n",
+			dirname);
+		return;
+	}
+	while ((de = readdir(dir)) != NULL) {
+		if (!prefixcmp(de->d_name, "tmp_")) {
+			char name[PATH_MAX];
+			int c = snprintf(name, PATH_MAX, "%s/%s",
+					 dirname, de->d_name);
+			if (c < 0 || c >= PATH_MAX)
+				continue;
+			if (expire) {
+				struct stat st;
+				if (stat(name, &st) != 0 || st.st_mtime >= expire)
+					continue;
+			}
+			printf("Removing stale temporary file %s\n", name);
+			if (!show_only)
+				unlink(name);
+		}
+	}
+	closedir(dir);
+}
+
 int cmd_prune(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
 {
 	int i;

@@ -115,5 +153,6 @@ int cmd_prune(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)

 	sync();
 	prune_packed_objects(show_only);
+	remove_temporary_files();
 	return 0;
 }

Hi,

On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, David Steven Tweed wrote:

This version incorporates all the agreed with changes from the previous 
version, and since I was modifying the relevant context lines it 
includes Johannes' code honouring --expire (but not the test he wrote 
which is presumably best sent as a separate patch from him).

No, I don't want the tests as a separate patch.  They are intrinsic to 
your patch, since they show that your patch does what it's supposed to do 
(at least in an empirical way).

Ciao,
Dscho