Hi,
I just hit a really strange thing:
I was on a branch called 'v4-0-test',
then I did a git rebase -i orgin/v4-0-test
and removed some patches and prefixed all others
with 'edit'.
Then:
git commit --amend
git rebase --continue
git commit --amend
git rebase --continue
git commit --amend
git commit --amend (again)
git branch
* v4-0-test
git log
(this showed what I wanted)
git show -p --stat
(to really make sure that the top revision is the one I want)
git push origin v4-0-test
And this pushed the top revision BEFORE the rebase!!!
Because I forgot a 'git rebase --continue' to finalize the rebase.
In the end it's my fault, because I forgot the last rebase --continue,
but I think it's bad that git behaves that way.
Would it be possible to disable some operations while others
are unfinished, git am (-i) might have similar effects.
I was using git 1.5.3.2
Could it be that 6fd2f5e60d4d574ff9e5dd8ce1e229328c785d69 was
created to fix a similar problem?
metze
http://gitweb.samba.org/?p=samba.git;a=commit;h=ec0ee2aa5f4bef32f09a426d91c28c985f843038
and the 10 commits before...:-(
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:09
Hi,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
[started git rebase -i]
git commit --amend (again)
git branch
* v4-0-test
git log
(this showed what I wanted)
git show -p --stat
(to really make sure that the top revision is the one I want)
git push origin v4-0-test
And this pushed the top revision BEFORE the rebase!!!
Because I forgot a 'git rebase --continue' to finalize the rebase.
I don't believe it. "git branch" would have shown "* (no branch)" as
current branch, unless the rebase is finalized.
git rebase -i works on a _detached_ HEAD, for two reasons:
- easier working with reflogs (as the branch's reflog shows before rebase
and after rebase, but nothing in between), and
- to prevent exactly the scenario you are describing.
Ciao,
Dscho
From: Steven Walter <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:09
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:42:06PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
I don't believe it. "git branch" would have shown "* (no branch)" as
current branch, unless the rebase is finalized.
git rebase -i works on a _detached_ HEAD, for two reasons:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
quoted
I was using git 1.5.3.2
Did rebase -i in git 1.5.3.2 use a detached head? I thought that was
new in 1.5.4.
--
-Steven Walter [off-list ref]
Freedom is the freedom to say that 2 + 2 = 4
B2F1 0ECC E605 7321 E818 7A65 FC81 9777 DC28 9E8F
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:09
Hi,
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Steven Walter wrote:
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:42:06PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
I don't believe it. "git branch" would have shown "* (no branch)" as
current branch, unless the rebase is finalized.
git rebase -i works on a _detached_ HEAD, for two reasons:
quoted
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
quoted
I was using git 1.5.3.2
Did rebase -i in git 1.5.3.2 use a detached head? I thought that was
new in 1.5.4.
rebase -i uses a detached HEAD since it was merged. In 1.5.4, rebase
(note the absence of -i) uses a detached HEAD, too.
Ciao,
Dscho
On Sat, Feb 02, 2008 at 03:42:06PM +0000, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
quoted
I don't believe it. "git branch" would have shown "* (no branch)" as
current branch, unless the rebase is finalized.
git rebase -i works on a _detached_ HEAD, for two reasons:
On Sat, 2 Feb 2008, Stefan (metze) Metzmacher wrote:
quoted
I was using git 1.5.3.2
Did rebase -i in git 1.5.3.2 use a detached head? I thought that was
new in 1.5.4.
rebase -i uses a detached HEAD since it was merged. In 1.5.4, rebase
(note the absence of -i) uses a detached HEAD, too.
Hmm, I can't reproduce this...maybe I was just to stupid and didn't look
at the git branch output carefully...
metze