3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: Miles Bader <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:08
Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
First, git project does NOT use GNU ChangeLog convention for it's commit messages. We rather use descriptive commit messages.
Not that what Jari wrote had much resemblance to GNU ChangeLog format... -Miles -- Opposition, n. In politics the party that prevents the Goverment from running amok by hamstringing it.
From: David Symonds <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:08
On Jan 29, 2008 4:59 PM, Miles Bader [off-list ref] wrote:
Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:quoted
First, git project does NOT use GNU ChangeLog convention for it's commit messages. We rather use descriptive commit messages.Not that what Jari wrote had much resemblance to GNU ChangeLog format...
What, like http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Style-of-Change-Logs.html#Style-of-Change-Logs ? It looked like GNU style to me. Dave.
From: Miles Bader <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:08
On Jan 29, 2008 4:25 PM, David Symonds [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Not that what Jari wrote had much resemblance to GNU ChangeLog format...What, like http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Style-of-Change-Logs.html#Style-of-Change-Logs ? It looked like GNU style to me.
No, all the details are wrong. Just about the only thing in common with ChangeLog format is that he used asterisks as bullets, and a colon to indicate the descriptive text -- but that's simply what people tend to do when making an itemized list in ascii... -Miles -- Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.