In the current git repository, try this:
gitk origin/master..origin/pu
and it starts out looking ok.
But then scroll down a bit (say, press "PageDown" ten to twenty times),
and scroll up again, and now that thing is totally unusable.
Is it just me?
Linus
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:07
Hi,
On Sat, 19 Jan 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In the current git repository, try this:
gitk origin/master..origin/pu
and it starts out looking ok.
But then scroll down a bit (say, press "PageDown" ten to twenty times),
and scroll up again, and now that thing is totally unusable.
Is it just me?
Just tried; I'm getting a lot of horizontal pink lines which seem to
extend infinitely to the right, where at first they were vertical lines...
So it is not just you, I guess.
Ciao,
Dscho
From: Alex Riesen <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:07
Linus Torvalds, Sun, Jan 20, 2008 02:44:58 +0100:
In the current git repository, try this:
gitk origin/master..origin/pu
and it starts out looking ok.
But then scroll down a bit (say, press "PageDown" ten to twenty times),
and scroll up again, and now that thing is totally unusable.
Is it just me?
No, it was already reported:
Message-ID: [off-list ref]
From: Paul Mackerras <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:07
Linus Torvalds writes:
In the current git repository, try this:
gitk origin/master..origin/pu
and it starts out looking ok.
But then scroll down a bit (say, press "PageDown" ten to twenty times),
and scroll up again, and now that thing is totally unusable.
Is it just me?
No, I have seen it occasionally (though not recently), but I've never
been able to trigger it when I had some time to debug it. :/
I'd be interested to know if you can trigger it with the "dev" branch
of gitk, too. The dev branch doesn't use --topo-order or
--date-order, but instead does the topological sort itself, so the
cold-cache case is a lot faster (and the hot-cache case goes just as
fast as before). And because I can now reorder the commits, I can put
each open-circle commit just after the last merge that has it as a
parent, which ends up looking much nicer too.
Paul.
From: Johannes Sixt <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:07
Paul Mackerras schrieb:
Linus Torvalds writes:
quoted
In the current git repository, try this:
gitk origin/master..origin/pu
and it starts out looking ok.
But then scroll down a bit (say, press "PageDown" ten to twenty times),
and scroll up again, and now that thing is totally unusable.
Is it just me?
No, I have seen it occasionally (though not recently), but I've never
been able to trigger it when I had some time to debug it. :/
I'd be interested to know if you can trigger it with the "dev" branch
of gitk, too. The dev branch doesn't use --topo-order or
--date-order, but instead does the topological sort itself, so the
cold-cache case is a lot faster (and the hot-cache case goes just as
fast as before). And because I can now reorder the commits, I can put
each open-circle commit just after the last merge that has it as a
parent, which ends up looking much nicer too.
The dev branch is fine in this regard. In fact, this is the primary reason
why I'm using it.
BTW, there are still a few layout glitches, in particular, when F5
(Update) is used after frequent rebase/cherry-pick/commit/--amend. I'll
bug you once I know how to reproduce them.
-- Hannes
From: Alex Riesen <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:07
Paul Mackerras, Mon, Jan 21, 2008 10:50:34 +0100:
I'd be interested to know if you can trigger it with the "dev" branch
of gitk, too. The dev branch doesn't use --topo-order or
--date-order, but instead does the topological sort itself, so the
cold-cache case is a lot faster (and the hot-cache case goes just as
fast as before). And because I can now reorder the commits, I can put
each open-circle commit just after the last merge that has it as a
parent, which ends up looking much nicer too.
It is better, but sometimes the layout seem to be a bit too
"aggressively cleaned up": there are just merges and arrows pointing
in all directions but very few of real information.