fast-import.c: zlib_compression_level vs pack_compression_level

3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

fast-import.c: zlib_compression_level vs pack_compression_level

From: Marco Costalba <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:06

Just a small thing I would like to bring to your attention before 1.5.4 is out

During my work on compression/decompression cleanup I have found that
in fast-import.c the zlib_compression_level is used, while in
builtin-pack-objects is used pack_compression_level instead.

This 2 flags corresponds, more or less directly, (some cleanup is
needed also in that area, but this is another story) to:

core.loosecompression

and

pack.compression

config settings.

My question is, does fast-import should use pack.compression instead
of core.loosecompression?

Thanks
Marco

Re: fast-import.c: zlib_compression_level vs pack_compression_level

From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:06

On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Marco Costalba wrote:
My question is, does fast-import should use pack.compression instead
of core.loosecompression?
Yes it should.


Nicolas

Re: fast-import.c: zlib_compression_level vs pack_compression_level

From: Marco Costalba <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:06

On Jan 18, 2008 4:44 PM, Nicolas Pitre [off-list ref] wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008, Marco Costalba wrote:
quoted
My question is, does fast-import should use pack.compression instead
of core.loosecompression?
Yes it should.
I have a patch on top of my comrpession cleanup series, if people
agree I would leave this as is now. It's really not a biggie and 1.5.4
_seems_ very near.


Marco
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help