Re: [PATCH 2/5] git-submodule: New subcommand 'summary' (2) - hard work
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:04
Ping Yin [off-list ref] writes:
+ git diff $cache_option --raw $head -- $modules | + grep '^:160000\|:000000 160000' | + cut -c2- | + while read mod_src mod_dst sha1_src sha1_dst status name + do + sha1_dst=$(echo $sha1_dst | cut -c1-7) + sha1_src=$(echo $sha1_src | cut -c1-7)
If you are willing to lose precision forever like this, I think you can run "git diff" with --abbrev and lose this cut.
+ check_dst=t + check_src=t + case $status in + D) + check_dst= + ;; + A) + check_src= + ;;
I'd loosen the above grep (see my comments to your 1/5) and also add this: *) continue ;# punt ;; so that the rest of the code won't break when seeing a path that was submodule in the HEAD but is a blob in the index.
+ esac + + ( + errmsg= + unfound_src= + unfound_dst= + + test -z "$check_src" || + GIT_DIR="$name/.git" git-rev-parse $sha1_src >&/dev/null ||
And the precision of $sha1_src matter here. Be it done with "diff --abbrev" at the toplevel or your "cut", that may not be unique enough in the submodule. I think you would want to read full 40-char sha1_src and sha1_dst with "while read", and keep that full 40-char in these variables, and use them when calling rev-parse here. If you are checking if that the object exists in the submodule, use "rev-parse --verify", which was designed for exactly that purpose. If you also want to verify if the object is a commit, which may be a good idea anyway, "rev-parse --verify $sha1_src^0". To be portable, use traditional ">/dev/null 2>&1", not ">&/dev/null".
+ case "$unfound_src,$unfound_dst" in + t,) + errmsg=" Warn: $name doesn't contain commit $sha1_src" + ;; + ,t) + errmsg=" Warn: $name doesn't contain commit $sha1_dst" + ;; + t,t) + errmsg=" Warn: $name doesn't contain commits $sha1_src and $sha1_dst" + ;;
When reporting errors, you would want to give full 40-chars...
+ *)
+ left=
+ right=
+ test -n "$check_src" &&
+ left=$(GIT_DIR="$name/.git" git log --pretty=format:" <%s" \
+ ${check_dst:+$sha1_dst..}$sha1_src 2>/dev/null)
+
+ test -n "$check_dst" &&
+ right=$(GIT_DIR="$name/.git" git log --reverse --pretty=format:" >%s" \
+ ${check_src:+$sha1_src..}$sha1_dst 2>/dev/null)
+ ;;
+ esac
+
+ echo "* $name $sha1_src...$sha1_dst:"While reporting like this, you would want the shortened form, perhaps produced your "cut -c1-7".
+ if test -n "$errmsg" + then + echo "$errmsg" + else + test -n "$left" && echo "$left" + test -n "$right" && echo "$right" + fi + echo + ) | sed 's/^/# /' + done
I'd prefer to always have "-e" before the sed expression.
Any reason why you want separate invocation of sed inside the
while loop? IOW, why isn't it like this?
git diff --raw |
while read ...
do
...
done | sed -e 's/^/# /'
+ cd "$cwd"
Hmmm.