[PATCH] fix comment in strbuf.h to use correct name strbuf_avail()

Subsystems: the rest

DORMANTno replies

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

[PATCH] fix comment in strbuf.h to use correct name strbuf_avail()

From: Steffen Prohaska <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:46

Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <redacted>
---
 strbuf.h |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Note, the patch is against Junio's pu.

    Steffen
diff --git a/strbuf.h b/strbuf.h
index 9720826..e5cdd1e 100644
--- a/strbuf.h
+++ b/strbuf.h
@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@
  *
  *    strbuf_grow(sb, SOME_SIZE);
  *    // ... here the memory areay starting at sb->buf, and of length
- *    // sb_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that sb_avail(sb) is at
- *    // least SOME_SIZE
+ *    // strbuf_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that strbuf_avail(sb)
+ *    // is at least SOME_SIZE
  *    strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + SOME_OTHER_SIZE);
  *
- *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to sb_avail(sb).
+ *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to strbuf_avail(sb).
  *
  *    Doing so is safe, though if it has to be done in many places, adding the
  *    missing API to the strbuf module is the way to go.
-- 
1.5.3.4.464.ge1bc2

Re: [PATCH] fix comment in strbuf.h to use correct name strbuf_avail()

From: Pierre Habouzit <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:46

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 08:02:21AM +0000, Steffen Prohaska wrote:
Signed-off-by: Steffen Prohaska <redacted>
  Acked-By: Pierre Habouzit [off-list ref]
quoted hunk
---
 strbuf.h |    6 +++---
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

Note, the patch is against Junio's pu.

    Steffen
diff --git a/strbuf.h b/strbuf.h
index 9720826..e5cdd1e 100644
--- a/strbuf.h
+++ b/strbuf.h
@@ -24,11 +24,11 @@
  *
  *    strbuf_grow(sb, SOME_SIZE);
  *    // ... here the memory areay starting at sb->buf, and of length
- *    // sb_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that sb_avail(sb) is at
- *    // least SOME_SIZE
+ *    // strbuf_avail(sb) is all yours, and you are sure that strbuf_avail(sb)
+ *    // is at least SOME_SIZE
  *    strbuf_setlen(sb, sb->len + SOME_OTHER_SIZE);
  *
- *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to sb_avail(sb).
+ *    Of course, SOME_OTHER_SIZE must be smaller or equal to strbuf_avail(sb).
  *
  *    Doing so is safe, though if it has to be done in many places, adding the
  *    missing API to the strbuf module is the way to go.
-- 
1.5.3.4.464.ge1bc2
-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help