Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introduce --dirty option to git-rebase, allowing you to start from a dirty state.

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

Doesn't this have the exact same problem with the one in 'next'
that uses "git-stash create", which Shawn said he was upset
about, and I said I will revert?

Sorry, --dirty is not the default, which changes everything.
Forget what I said, sorry for the noise.

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Doesn't this have the exact same problem with the one in 'next'
that uses "git-stash create", which Shawn said he was upset
about, and I said I will revert?

Sorry, --dirty is not the default, which changes everything.
Forget what I said, sorry for the noise.

I'm happy with having --dirty, but AS AN OPTION.  Heck, I'd probably
use it sometimes, but only if it also reapplies the stash after
the rebase is complete.  But doing that stash/apply automatically
is really freaking annoying.

For the same reasons why I like git-checkout not defaulting to -m.
I want Git to stop by default if I'm about to possibly go into a
command that is going to cause conflicts, as I may not be ready to
deal with them right now.

-- 
Shawn.