Re: Status of kha/experimental

"Catalin Marinas" [off-list ref] writes:

On 07/10/2007, Karl Hasselström [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 2007-10-07 22:18:44 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:

quoted

How stable is the kha/experimental branch? Since there are more and
more bugs added to the tracking system, I'll have to start looking
at them before a 0.14 release. Is it worth merging the
kha/experimental now or we better wait for after 0.14?

The idea is that experimental contains changes that need testing, but
may not yet be ready for your master. (They are generally safe,
though; I run StGit from my experimental branch at work, for example.)
When I decide that they are ready, I move them to safe. If there are
any patches you feel should be in safe rather than experimental, just
ask. Or you could just take them directly from experimental without
asking, of course. :-)

OK. My plan is to merge kha/safe and have a look at what seems safer
to merge from kha/experimental. Fix bugs (and freeze the current
features). Release 0.14. Merge kha/experimental entirely post 0.14 and
test/stabilize it over couple of months. How does this sound?

Sounds like a plan to me.  But we should probably fix the loose ends
in kha/experimental before merging it entirely.

-- 
David Kågedal

On 2007-10-10 09:39:15 +0200, David Kågedal wrote:

Sounds like a plan to me. But we should probably fix the loose ends
in kha/experimental before merging it entirely.

I tried to list the loose ends in my last update. There weren't that
many of them as I recall.

-- 
Karl Hasselström, kha@treskal.com
      www.treskal.com/kalle