Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
Suggested by Junio, but the errors are all mine.
I am not quite certain, though, if there is really no porcelain
using that option. It has been around since Oct 7 2005 (!), so
there is a real chance that StGit, guilt or QGit use it. In that
case, this patch is obviously wrong.
You do not have to do the deprecating/removing part if that is
the issue.
Hi,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Suggested by Junio, but the errors are all mine.
I am not quite certain, though, if there is really no porcelain
using that option. It has been around since Oct 7 2005 (!), so
there is a real chance that StGit, guilt or QGit use it. In that
case, this patch is obviously wrong.
You do not have to do the deprecating/removing part if that is
the issue.
I'd rather avoid keeping this code, if nobody uses it anyway...
So I cloned StGit and guilt (the two porcelains that I feel are most used,
apart from what is in git.git, and I'm too lazy to find that mail
analysing the recent Git survey). Neither of them has any --index-info in
their complete history.
So I'm more confident now that there is no need to keep --index-info.
Ciao,
Dscho