4 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: David Kastrup <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:35
Alexander Wuerstlein [off-list ref] writes:
On 070916 14:46, Christian Stimming [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
msgid "commit [noun]" msgstr "?bertragung (Sendung?, ?bergabe?, Einspielung?, Ablagevorgang?)""Vorgang"? (think Beamtendeutsch)
Buchung, Einbuchung, Verbuchung, Registrierung? -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
From: Alexander Wuerstlein <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:35
On 070916 23:34, David Kastrup [off-list ref] wrote:
Alexander Wuerstlein [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 070916 14:46, Christian Stimming [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
msgid "commit [noun]" msgstr "?bertragung (Sendung?, ?bergabe?, Einspielung?, Ablagevorgang?)""Vorgang"? (think Beamtendeutsch)Buchung, Einbuchung, Verbuchung, Registrierung?
Transaktion? Ciao, Alexander Wuerstlein.
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:35
Hi, On Mon, 17 Sep 2007, Alexander Wuerstlein wrote:
On 070916 23:34, David Kastrup [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Alexander Wuerstlein [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On 070916 14:46, Christian Stimming [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
msgid "commit [noun]" msgstr "?bertragung (Sendung?, ?bergabe?, Einspielung?, Ablagevorgang?)""Vorgang"? (think Beamtendeutsch)Buchung, Einbuchung, Verbuchung, Registrierung?Transaktion?
The real problem is that we use "commit" in two senses:
- the action ("to commit", but also, "to do a commit") of making a new
revision, but also
- the revision in the revision graph ("is this in the commit abcdef?").
So I do not think that any proposals reflect the ambiguity of "a commit".
I actually talk about "Revision" in German, when I refer to a commit.
Ciao,
Dscho
From: Christian Stimming <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:35
Am Montag, 17. September 2007 11:17 schrieb Johannes Schindelin:
quoted
quoted
quoted
quoted
msgid "commit [noun]" msgstr "?bertragung (Sendung?, ?bergabe?, Einspielung?, Ablagevorgang?)""Vorgang"? (think Beamtendeutsch)Buchung, Einbuchung, Verbuchung, Registrierung?Transaktion?The real problem is that we use "commit" in two senses: - the action ("to commit", but also, "to do a commit") of making a new revision, but also - the revision in the revision graph ("is this in the commit abcdef?").
This is exactly the noun vs. the verb ambiguity. This is exactly why those are mentioned as two different entries in the glossary.
So I do not think that any proposals reflect the ambiguity of "a commit". I actually talk about "Revision" in German, when I refer to a commit.
Yes, that's what I am leaning towards as well. Let's see. Christian