Re: [PATCH 3/9] Add strbuf_printf() to do formatted printing to a strbuf.

3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 3/9] Add strbuf_printf() to do formatted printing to a strbuf.

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:33

As you noted in your follow-up message, this one has overlaps
with the other strbuf series.  I could adjust them if I wanted
to, but I do not have time for it right now.  I might try over
the weekend but no promises.

Re: [PATCH 3/9] Add strbuf_printf() to do formatted printing to a strbuf.

From: Pierre Habouzit <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:33

On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:55:26AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
As you noted in your follow-up message, this one has overlaps
with the other strbuf series.  I could adjust them if I wanted
to, but I do not have time for it right now.  I might try over
the weekend but no promises.
  This one is exactly the same as the one that follows, I corrected a
typo in the comment of the commit, and I forgot to cleanse my tree
before running format-patch again, so you have the "second" patch twice
(name of the patch changed, hence the new one did not replaced the
previous, but created a 0002-foo.patch instead of overwriting the
0002-bar.patch).

  You just must drop the one I followup-ed to.

-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org

Re: [PATCH 3/9] Add strbuf_printf() to do formatted printing to a strbuf.

From: Pierre Habouzit <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:33

On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:43:23AM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:55:26AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
As you noted in your follow-up message, this one has overlaps
with the other strbuf series.  I could adjust them if I wanted
to, but I do not have time for it right now.  I might try over
the weekend but no promises.
  This one is exactly the same as the one that follows, I corrected a
typo in the comment of the commit, and I forgot to cleanse my tree
before running format-patch again, so you have the "second" patch twice
(name of the patch changed, hence the new one did not replaced the
previous, but created a 0002-foo.patch instead of overwriting the
0002-bar.patch).

  You just must drop the one I followup-ed to.
  err sorry, I mixed up with another thread. Did not had coffee yet :/

  Just nvm


-- 
·O·  Pierre Habouzit
··O                                                madcoder@debian.org
OOO                                                http://www.madism.org
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help