On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:55:26AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
As you noted in your follow-up message, this one has overlaps
with the other strbuf series. I could adjust them if I wanted
to, but I do not have time for it right now. I might try over
the weekend but no promises.
This one is exactly the same as the one that follows, I corrected a
typo in the comment of the commit, and I forgot to cleanse my tree
before running format-patch again, so you have the "second" patch twice
(name of the patch changed, hence the new one did not replaced the
previous, but created a 0002-foo.patch instead of overwriting the
0002-bar.patch).
You just must drop the one I followup-ed to.
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 09:43:23AM +0000, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
On Thu, Sep 06, 2007 at 08:55:26AM +0000, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
As you noted in your follow-up message, this one has overlaps
with the other strbuf series. I could adjust them if I wanted
to, but I do not have time for it right now. I might try over
the weekend but no promises.
This one is exactly the same as the one that follows, I corrected a
typo in the comment of the commit, and I forgot to cleanse my tree
before running format-patch again, so you have the "second" patch twice
(name of the patch changed, hence the new one did not replaced the
previous, but created a 0002-foo.patch instead of overwriting the
0002-bar.patch).
You just must drop the one I followup-ed to.
err sorry, I mixed up with another thread. Did not had coffee yet :/
Just nvm
--
·O· Pierre Habouzit
··O madcoder@debian.org
OOO http://www.madism.org