3 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: David Kastrup <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:32
"Reece Dunn" [off-list ref] writes:
Which is good, as this means that along with the tests in the library, it will be more stable and less likely to be buggy than something that is written from scratch.
Remember git's history. -- David Kastrup, Kriemhildstr. 15, 44793 Bochum
From: Reece Dunn <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:32
On 02/09/07, David Kastrup [off-list ref] wrote:
"Reece Dunn" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Which is good, as this means that along with the tests in the library, it will be more stable and less likely to be buggy than something that is written from scratch.Remember git's history.
True! - Reece
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:32
David Kastrup wrote:
"Reece Dunn" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Which is good, as this means that along with the tests in the library, it will be more stable and less likely to be buggy than something that is written from scratch.Remember git's history.
On the other hand instead of doing binary diffs from a scratch, git uses [customized] LibXDiff library. The same might be done with bstring library, I think. -- Jakub Narebski Warsaw, Poland ShadeHawk on #git