Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
There was idea to special case clone (just concatenate the packs, the
receiving side as someone told there can detect pack boundaries; do not
forget to pack loose objects, first), instead of using generic fetch --all
for clone, bnut no code. Code speaks louder than words (although if someone
would provide details of pack boundary detection...)
I have to say that "although ..." part of that statement
disqualifies this to be called an "idea".
Really, I find that you (yes, in this case I am not generalizing
but talking specifically about you) tend to overuse the word
"idea" when you talk things that are not yet even at that stage
yet.
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
There was idea to special case clone (just concatenate the packs, the
receiving side as someone told there can detect pack boundaries; do not
forget to pack loose objects, first), instead of using generic fetch --all
for clone, bnut no code. Code speaks louder than words (although if someone
would provide details of pack boundary detection...)
I have to say that "although ..." part of that statement
disqualifies this to be called an "idea".
Ermm... if I remember correctly during discussion (single subthread)
there were provided details, or at least idea, of how to separate
concatented packs into individual packs. Unfortunately I haven't
saved the message, and do not remember enogh of it to search archives...
I should have wrote "remind" instead of "provide" there...
Really, I find that you (yes, in this case I am not generalizing
but talking specifically about you) tend to overuse the word
"idea" when you talk things that are not yet even at that stage
yet.
I'm not native English speaker... ;-)
Seriously, it's a fault of mine...
--
Jakub Narebski
Poland