Re: Problem using git svn clone

"Gustaf Hendeby" [off-list ref] writes:

On 5/25/07, Seth Falcon [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

"Gustaf Hendeby" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Let me clarify. When trying to check out the module with tags, the first
example I only get the revisions, no content at all!  I have added some more
info on this below.

If you see the output of the revisions being pulled from svn this
seems very odd.  Does a 'du -sh' in the created directory confirm no
data is there?  Are you sure it isn't just a matter of nothing getting
checked out for you?

The following result is the same directly after the clone attempt and
after a git checkout -f master:

$ du -hs
357K    .
$ ls -a
.  ..  .git

If it is just not checked out I don't know what I'm doing wrong trying
to check it out.

That does seem like either something is broken or not doing what you
expect (how's that for non-informative?).

I'm not sure I have enough expertise to help further.  If you care
about getting to the bottom of this, then I suspect you need to help
specify something that can be reproduced by others (which can be
difficult).

In the meantime, if I understood your comments, you did find a way to
clone the repos as you wanted just with a different command line...

+ seth

-- 
Seth Falcon | Computational Biology | Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
http://bioconductor.org

On 5/25/07, Seth Falcon [off-list ref] wrote:

"Gustaf Hendeby" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

On 5/25/07, Seth Falcon [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

"Gustaf Hendeby" [off-list ref] writes:

I'm not sure I have enough expertise to help further.  If you care
about getting to the bottom of this, then I suspect you need to help
specify something that can be reproduced by others (which can be
difficult).

Ok fair enough, I am *very* *thankful* for your attempt to help me!

In the meantime, if I understood your comments, you did find a way to
clone the repos as you wanted just with a different command line...

Well, not really what I want since I lose all tags, but close enough
to be useful.   That will have do for time being.

One again, thanks!

/Gustaf