Re: [PATCH] Document patch syntax.
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:09
Karl Hasselström [off-list ref] writes:
On 2007-05-12 16:38:27 +0200, Yann Dirson wrote:quoted
However, that makes me think we should probably use guideline for the docs - here comes the question of which convention to use when refering to the user. Do we address her directly ("you"), indirectly ("the user", "her" - don't remember where the "female user" use comes from, but we could maybe follow this), even more indirectly ("one"), or any other way ?I'd go with "you", or possibly "one" (but I strongly prefer "you"). Talking about the user in the third person ("the user", "her", etc.) seems actively wrong when we are instructing the user on how to do things.
With the context in question, I find 'the user' is the most natural and neutral. I think the "female user" use is not so widely accepted. I always found it to be a sign that the author, a lonely male nerd developer, is wishing to live in a dream world where he becomes a hero by helping an attractive female user that he would never have chance to interact with otherwise in his real life ;-). For tutorial/walkthru type of documentation, my usual preference is "we", not "you". "Now our little repository should be in this shape." "Let's change our Makefile to do a bit more." That sets the tone that a slightly more knowledgeable friend is helping the user by working together with him, instead of an expert talking to a stupid user from a high place, but that is a bit offtopic.