Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] Change default man page path to /usr/share/man

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] Change default man page path to /usr/share/man

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:09

Ismail Dönmez [off-list ref] writes:
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 13:49:31 you wrote:
quoted
Hi,

According to FHS standard default man page path is $prefix/share/man [0] ,
attached patch fixes this for GIT.

[0] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREMANMANUALPAGES

Signed-off-by: Ismail Donmez <redacted>
ACK? NAK? Do we care about this? :)
I would not say the patch is wrong per-se, but:

 - People who do not override prefix to install in $HOME would
   suddenly get their mandir under $HOME/share/man; the fact
   nobody complained so far suggests me that these people have
   $MANPATH pointing at $HOME/man, which means your patch breaks
   things for them, unless they have been overriding mandir in
   which case your patch does not matter to them;

 - Distros who package git and want to conform to FHS would have
   been overriding not just prefix but mandir anyway, so your patch
   is not an improvement to them;

 - People who override prefix to install locally in /usr or
   /usr/local does "make prefix=" thing anyway, and the fact
   nobody complained so far suggests me that they have already
   known they need to override mandir as well if they do not
   like /usr/local/man, so your patch is not an improvement to
   them.

That makes one half negative plus two and half neutral.

Re: [PATCH] [TRIVIAL] Change default man page path to /usr/share/man

From: Ismail Dönmez <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:09

On Friday 11 May 2007 22:27:35 you wrote:
Ismail Dönmez [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Tuesday 08 May 2007 13:49:31 you wrote:
quoted
Hi,

According to FHS standard default man page path is $prefix/share/man [0]
, attached patch fixes this for GIT.

[0] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREMANMANUALPAGES

Signed-off-by: Ismail Donmez <redacted>
ACK? NAK? Do we care about this? :)
I would not say the patch is wrong per-se, but:

 - People who do not override prefix to install in $HOME would
   suddenly get their mandir under $HOME/share/man; the fact
   nobody complained so far suggests me that these people have
   $MANPATH pointing at $HOME/man, which means your patch breaks
   things for them, unless they have been overriding mandir in
   which case your patch does not matter to them;
Or nobody is reading man pages? *g*
 - Distros who package git and want to conform to FHS would have
   been overriding not just prefix but mandir anyway, so your patch
   is not an improvement to them;
True that.
 - People who override prefix to install locally in /usr or
   /usr/local does "make prefix=" thing anyway, and the fact
   nobody complained so far suggests me that they have already
   known they need to override mandir as well if they do not
   like /usr/local/man, so your patch is not an improvement to
   them.
Most(All?) distros /usr/share/man in MANPATH so I believe this patch shouldn't 
break anything but well you have the final say. I am ok with doing   
make mandir=/usr/share/man install-doc .

Regards,
ismail

-- 
Perfect is the enemy of good
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help