From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:06
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:
Hello,
Not important at all, but I was surprised to see this:
$ git fetch \
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.16.y.git \
refs/heads/master:refs/remotes/vendor
remote: Generating pack...
Two possible explanations:
1) I recently fixed pack-objects which didn't respect the delta depth
limit when fetching. See commit 898b14cedc for details. This could
potentially cause some repacks to create slightly larger packs.
2) When fetching a pack, the client sends its capabilities to the server
who can alter some packing parameters accordingly. One such
parameter is --delta-base-offset which your client most certainly
supports. This means that the packs you receive and keep as is in
your local repo were encoded with --delta-base-offset for maximum
network efficiency.
Now when you repack, this parameter won't be used by default unless
you have repack.usedeltabaseoffset set to true in your config, which
will cause a small increase in pack size.
I think that (2) is the most probable cause of repack growth in your
case. Just try:
git config --global repack.usedeltabaseoffset true
git gc
and you should get that 2MB back, possibly a bit more.
Nicolas
From: Andy Parkins <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:06
On Tuesday 2007 April 24, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
Thank you for your thorough explanation.
Now when you repack, this parameter won't be used by default unless
you have repack.usedeltabaseoffset set to true in your config, which
will cause a small increase in pack size.
That sounds like it could easily be it. I thought I had usedeltabaseoffset
turned on ages ago; but it turns out (while investigating this strange
behaviour) what I actually had turned on was "usedelatabaseoffset".
Doh!
I think that (2) is the most probable cause of repack growth in your
case. Just try:
git config --global repack.usedeltabaseoffset true
git gc
and you should get that 2MB back, possibly a bit more.
Strangely enough - I didn't - stayed at 97MB. It's probably (1) then.
Thanks for your time. You've helped me find a typo in my config even if I
didn't get my 2MB back :-)
Andy
--
Dr Andy Parkins, M Eng (hons), MIET
andyparkins@gmail.com
From: Nicolas Pitre <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:06
On Tue, 24 Apr 2007, Andy Parkins wrote:
quoted
I think that (2) is the most probable cause of repack growth in your
case. Just try:
git config --global repack.usedeltabaseoffset true
git gc
and you should get that 2MB back, possibly a bit more.
Strangely enough - I didn't - stayed at 97MB. It's probably (1) then.
Well... to be sure, also try:
git config --global repack.usedeltabaseoffset false
git gc
and verify that the repository actually grew. If it stays the same then
something is not right.
Nicolas