Re: Some index-base bug in "next" branch ("git-applymbox"-related?)..

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: Some index-base bug in "next" branch ("git-applymbox"-related?)..

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:04

Linus Torvalds [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
This will teach applymbox the index base safety, but it shows
that the division between applymbox and applypatch makes things
less efficient than how git-am can do the same.
Hey, I'd happily use git-am too..

If you want to deprecare git-applymbox, why don't you just make it an 
alias for git-am, potentially doing the defaults and command line argument 
conversion?
I'd rather not.

The whole reason I did not _enhance_ git-applymbox but wrote a
separate git-am was because I found git-applymbox's command line
parameter quite insane and felt that supporting it at the same
time doing a saner command line parameter was too much kludge.

Re: Some index-base bug in "next" branch ("git-applymbox"-related?)..

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:43:04


On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
The whole reason I did not _enhance_ git-applymbox but wrote a
separate git-am was because I found git-applymbox's command line
parameter quite insane and felt that supporting it at the same
time doing a saner command line parameter was too much kludge.
Heh. I'll try to make my alias be

	alias dotest='git-am --utf8'

and see what happens ;)

		Linus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help