Hi,
I guess blame view need to pull the file content from the repository
rather than opening it directly. If i have a working copy that is not
yet committed it gives wrong results. I tried some changes as below.
But i guess there should be a much easier way.
-aneesh
Aneesh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
I guess blame view need to pull the file content from the repository
rather than opening it directly. If i have a working copy that is not
yet committed it gives wrong results. I tried some changes as below.
But i guess there should be a much easier way.
-open(my $fh, '<', $fn)
- or die "unable to open $fn: $!";
+$fh = get_file_handle("HEAD", $fn);
while(<$fh>) {
chomp;
$fileview->{data}->[$.] = ['HEAD', '?', "$fn:$.", $_];
Doesn't the following work just as well, and use a lot less code?
open(my $fh, '|-', 'git', 'cat-file', 'blob', "HEAD:$fn")
?
--
Shawn.
On 1/30/07, Shawn O. Pearce [off-list ref] wrote:
Aneesh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I guess blame view need to pull the file content from the repository
rather than opening it directly. If i have a working copy that is not
yet committed it gives wrong results. I tried some changes as below.
But i guess there should be a much easier way.
quoted
-open(my $fh, '<', $fn)
- or die "unable to open $fn: $!";
+$fh = get_file_handle("HEAD", $fn);
while(<$fh>) {
chomp;
$fileview->{data}->[$.] = ['HEAD', '?', "$fn:$.", $_];
Doesn't the following work just as well, and use a lot less code?
open(my $fh, '|-', 'git', 'cat-file', 'blob', "HEAD:$fn")
?
See i said that there should be a simple way. Can we get this
documented in git-cat-file man page
-aneesh
Aneesh Kumar [off-list ref] wrote:
See i said that there should be a simple way. Can we get this
documented in git-cat-file man page
Well, this isn't the git-cat-file man page, but we do suggest people
use `git show HEAD:foo.c` to get foo.c from HEAD in an interactive
setting. The git-show manpage refers people to git-rev-parse,
which has the following:
* A suffix ':' followed by a path; this names the blob or tree
at the given path in the tree-ish object named by the part
before the colon.
In a non-interactive case, well, that's what git-cat-file is for.
And <object> typically is meant to mean what git-rev-parse will
parse...
But if you submit a documentation update to git-cat-file's manpage
that points off to the same section of git-rev-parse, folks may
appreciate it. :-)
--
Shawn.