Re: [PATCH] git-blame --incremental: don't use pager

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] git-blame --incremental: don't use pager

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:51

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
René Scharfe [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Starting a pager defeats the purpose of the incremental output
mode.  This changes git-blame to only paginate if --incremental
was not given.
I should have done this myself when I applied Linus's patch.
Thanks for catching.
Although I'd apply it anyway, strictly speaking, I think this
patch should not matter because any real Porcelain would be
using this as an upstream of a pipe to its drawing engine.

Well, unless that Porcelain drives --incremental through a pair
of ptys, but I do not think it is likely ;-).

Re: [PATCH] git-blame --incremental: don't use pager

From: René Scharfe <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:51

Junio C Hamano schrieb:
Although I'd apply it anyway, strictly speaking, I think this
patch should not matter because any real Porcelain would be
using this as an upstream of a pipe to its drawing engine.

Well, unless that Porcelain drives --incremental through a pair
of ptys, but I do not think it is likely ;-).
Ha!, didn't think of that.  I still like it more without a pager
even if run on a terminal, because then you can *see* that it's
really incremental (without needing to unset PAGER).  I'm a
non-believer. ;-)

René
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help