Re: [PATCH] xdl_merge(): fix a segmentation fault when refining conflicts

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH] xdl_merge(): fix a segmentation fault when refining conflicts

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:47

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
That is certainly a possibility! But how would you specify it? If you 
do it as a command line option, you'd have to add it to git-merge, 
git-pull, git-merge-recursive and git-merge-file. Ugly.
Another thing to worry about is that this would make things
"works most of the time but when it fails it fails silently"
which would lead to very hard to detect problem in the project
managed by git.  I'd be very hesitant about this for this reason
alone.

Re: [PATCH] xdl_merge(): fix a segmentation fault when refining conflicts

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:47

Hi,

On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
That is certainly a possibility! But how would you specify it? If you 
do it as a command line option, you'd have to add it to git-merge, 
git-pull, git-merge-recursive and git-merge-file. Ugly.
Another thing to worry about is that this would make things
"works most of the time but when it fails it fails silently"
which would lead to very hard to detect problem in the project
managed by git.  I'd be very hesitant about this for this reason
alone.
Right. That was what I was alluding to with my comment "what if you prefer 
the deletion over the addition?"

It _seems_ clever at first sight, but it isn't.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help