# Re: \[ANNOUNCE\] Example Cogito Addon - cogito-bundle

- From: Petr Baudis \<hidden\>
- Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:44 
- List: git
- Page: https://ratatoskr.run/git/2016/06/7291954
- Thread: https://ratatoskr.run/git/2016/06/7291303/t/3.md

```text
Dear diary, on Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 10:49:53PM CEST, I got a letter
where David Lang [ref] said that...
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2006, Petr Baudis wrote:
> 
> >
> >Dear diary, on Fri, Oct 20, 2006 at 07:48:58PM CEST, I got a letter
> >where Linus Torvalds [ref] said that...
> >>So yeah, I've seen a few strange cases myself, but they've actually been
> >>interesting. Like seeing how much of a file was just a copyright license,
> >>and then a file being considered a "copy" just because it didn't actually
> >>introduce any real new code.
> >
> >Well it's certainly "interesting" and fun to see, but is it equally fun
> >to handle mismerges caused by a broken detection?
> >
> >I've talked to some people who really didn't mind (or even liked) Git's
> >heuristics when it came to _inspecting_ movement of content, but were
> >really nervous about merge following such heuristics.
> 
> remember, git only stores the results. so when you are merging it doesn't 
> even look for renames.

Of course it does look for renames; when you use the recursive strategy,
it will try to merge across renames.
```