Re: git and time
From: apodtele <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:42
Shall we summarize? Time is a very important concept in physics. Yet time is pretty much useless in math and git for that matter. GIT == Git Ignores Time
2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: apodtele <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:42
Shall we summarize? Time is a very important concept in physics. Yet time is pretty much useless in math and git for that matter. GIT == Git Ignores Time
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:42
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006, apodtele wrote:
Shall we summarize? Time is a very important concept in physics.
Actually, even in physics (or very _much_ in physics), time doesn't follow the nice procession that Matthew is kind of asking for. In physics, particles can go backwards in time or forwards in time (the _likelihood_ that a photon moves at exactly the speed of light is higher, but on a quantum scale, strange things happen). And everybody should by now know what relativity says: time does not impose an "ordering" of events outside of the so-called "cone of light". There is only an ordering imposed by _causality_, not by time. That, btw, is very similar to git. The only _true_ ordering in git is causality. Time itself tends to have certain properties that makes it _look_ like it is about causality, but in real life there is just a strong correlation. Nature is sometimes stranger than our everyday experiences would have us believe. And "time" is a hell of a lot more complicated than just a global one-dimensional entity, steadily ticking away. Linus