2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:40
"Dmitry V. Levin" [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 06:12:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
"Dmitry V. Levin" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
describe, git: Handle argc==0 case the same way as argc==1.When does one get (ac == 0)?When one executes something like execlp("git", NULL, NULL);
Fair enough.
What is the valid reason to do execlp("git", NULL, NULL)?
From: Dmitry V. Levin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:40
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 11:34:05PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
"Dmitry V. Levin" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Wed, Sep 13, 2006 at 06:12:02PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:quoted
"Dmitry V. Levin" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
describe, git: Handle argc==0 case the same way as argc==1.When does one get (ac == 0)?When one executes something like execlp("git", NULL, NULL);Fair enough. What is the valid reason to do execlp("git", NULL, NULL)?
Personally I do not plan to execute git this way on regular basis, indeed. :) But argc == 0 is allowed, so why should git crash? -- ldv