Re: [PATCH 1/2] t7001: add test for git-mv dir1 dir2/

Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:

  (i) No git-apply -R - well, it seems to me that I revert patches all
the time, don't you?

  (ii) I'd like git-apply to be as verbose as patch is, that is list
the files it touches as it goes

  (iii) There's no reject handling besides "panic" right now - it should
be able to create .rej files so that the user can fix things up

  (iv) I need git-apply to add/remove to/from index new/gone files,
while at the same time...

  (v) I want to allow applying of patches to working copy that is not
completely clean, even on top of modified files

You probably should be able to talk me into doing these, but
doesn't it already do (iv) and (v)?

Dear diary, on Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 04:41:04AM CEST, I got a letter
where Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] said that...

Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

  (iv) I need git-apply to add/remove to/from index new/gone files,
while at the same time...

  (v) I want to allow applying of patches to working copy that is not
completely clean, even on top of modified files

You probably should be able to talk me into doing these, but
doesn't it already do (iv) and (v)?

Well, at once? I can do (iv) by adding --index but that contradicts (v).
But maybe I'm missing something.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
Stuff: http://pasky.or.cz/
Snow falling on Perl. White noise covering line noise.
Hides all the bugs too. -- J. Putnam