Jonas Fonseca [off-list ref] writes:
This changes "[user@]" to use {startsb} and {endsb} to insert [ and ],
similar to how {caret} is used in git-rev-parse.txt.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <redacted>
Looks nicer. Alp? Does this work with your version of
asciidoc?
Junio C Hamano wrote:
Jonas Fonseca [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
This changes "[user@]" to use {startsb} and {endsb} to insert [ and ],
similar to how {caret} is used in git-rev-parse.txt.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Fonseca <redacted>
Looks nicer. Alp? Does this work with your version of
asciidoc?
I'm using asciidoc 7.0.2, which came with Ubuntu Dapper.
The man page output now looks like this:
· ssh://[ # [user@] # ]host.xz/path/to/repo.git/
· ssh://[ # [user@] # ]host.xz/~user/path/to/repo.git/
· ssh://[ # [user@] # ]host.xz/~/path/to/repo.git
Still not correct.
Out of the three patches,
(at) "ssh://[user@]host.xz/path/to/repo.git/"
(jc) "ssh://+++[user@+++]host.xz/path/to/repo.git/"
(jf) "ssh://{startsb}user@{endsb}host.xz/path/to/repo.git/"
I'd say (at) is still most readable, not requiring +++ markup (jc) or
hacks to asciidoc.conf (jf). And it's the only fix that's compatible
with older versions.
That's unless I've missed out on some detail that makes (at) unworkable.
If it's the dozen or so modified lines that are a problem, we can work
on a wdiff merge strategy or something in the time we save looking for
the asciidoc escape sequence that works for everyone. Junio?