Why's Git called Git ?
From: Aaron Gray <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:32
quoted
I am toying with using a VCS for a set of related projects, either CVS because its well known, SubVersion for ease of use, or Git as it is new. Lots to descide upon, any pointers would be appreciated.CVS is showing it's age; mainly the fact that IIRC it began as a series of scripts over RCS, file level version control system, extending version control to sets of files, somewhat. Branching in CVS is serious PITA. Renaming _with_ retaining full and correct history: forget about it.
Okay, we like branching and forking.
Subversion is "better CVS": still centralized, CVS infernal branching replaced by "cheap copy" branching. Well known, replaces CVS thorough OSS projects.
Okay.
Git, Mercurial, Monotone, Bazaar-NG, Darcs are new brand of distributed VCS. I really like notion of branching in Git; but be warned about tracking and not recording renames, and the need of explicit packing (the latter very minor). Powerfull, perhaps too powerfull for newbie user: but that is what Cogito is for (although now Git contains fairly large set of high-level commands).
We like to move forward.
http://git.or.cz/ http://git.or.cz/gitwiki http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/Git and "Other version control software" at http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitLinks
Yes, been there, thanks though.
P.S. If you decide to use Git as VCS for your project, consider adding entry about it on http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitProjects wiki page.
Looks like I maybe doing a preliminary Windows Git HOWTO on the GitWiki, if no one else has trod this ground :) (Might need some proper help testing though) Thanks, Aaron