Re: [PATCH 3/3] fetch: optionally store the current remote information in the config

2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15 · open the first message on its own page

Re: [PATCH 3/3] fetch: optionally store the current remote information in the config

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:25

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
	This is what the patch series is all about.

	If there is no interest in a feature like this, let's just forget
	about the whole "remote info in config" thing.
Well, I took the liberty of adjusting the first one in the
series and tonight's "pu" has that one and the second one.
I haven't touched the third one yet, though.

About the second one, I think it probably is a good idea to
rename the "refspec used for fetch" as Sean suggested earlier.
I do not like that hidden environment variable that sits in the
command I use everyday, waiting to be triggered to update my
.config file, possibly by my PEBCAK mistake when I did not want
it to do so.

I am not quite sure what this bit is about in the second one:

        sed -n \
        -e "s/^URL: /remote.$name.url . /p" \
        -e "s/^Pull: /remote.$name.pull ^$ /p" \
        -e "s/^Push: /remote.$name.push ^$ /p" \
	< "$f"

I am getting this out of the above:

        remote.ko.url . xxx.kernel.org:/pub/scm/git/git.git/
        remote.ko.pull ^$ master:refs/tags/ko-master
        remote.ko.pull ^$ next:refs/tags/ko-next
        remote.ko.pull ^$ +pu:refs/tags/ko-pu
        remote.ko.pull ^$ maint:refs/tags/ko-maint
        remote.ko.push ^$ heads/master
        remote.ko.push ^$ heads/next
        remote.ko.push ^$ +heads/pu
        remote.ko.push ^$ heads/maint

but I suspect that is not what you intended...

I think easy conversion tool is a good idea, but I would sleep
better if it is outside of git-fetch/push chain and is available
elsewhere, perhaps in contrib/ area.

On a slightly related topic, I think my aversion to your "push
remotes into config" series the last time was primarily because
I do not trust repo-config.  Reading an already built config
seems to work OK and I do not worry too much, but I am still
wary of letting it write.  Typing "git repo-config" in a freshly
initialized empty repository seems to segfault, which does not
help my confidence level either.

Re: [PATCH 3/3] fetch: optionally store the current remote information in the config

From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:42:25

Hi,

On Tue, 2 May 2006, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
	This is what the patch series is all about.

	If there is no interest in a feature like this, let's just forget
	about the whole "remote info in config" thing.
Well, I took the liberty of adjusting the first one in the
series and tonight's "pu" has that one and the second one.
I haven't touched the third one yet, though.
I don't think it is worth introducing yet another way to specify 
short-cuts for remote information, if there is not at least one problem 
which can get solved easier with it than with the other two ways.
About the second one, I think it probably is a good idea to
rename the "refspec used for fetch" as Sean suggested earlier.
Okay.
I do not like that hidden environment variable that sits in the
command I use everyday, waiting to be triggered to update my
.config file, possibly by my PEBCAK mistake when I did not want
it to do so.
I will refactor it.
I am not quite sure what this bit is about in the second one:

        sed -n \
        -e "s/^URL: /remote.$name.url . /p" \
        -e "s/^Pull: /remote.$name.pull ^$ /p" \
        -e "s/^Push: /remote.$name.push ^$ /p" \
	< "$f"
That is obviously wrong. Will fix while refactoring.
I think easy conversion tool is a good idea, but I would sleep
better if it is outside of git-fetch/push chain and is available
elsewhere, perhaps in contrib/ area.
Will do.
On a slightly related topic, I think my aversion to your "push
remotes into config" series the last time was primarily because
I do not trust repo-config.  Reading an already built config
seems to work OK and I do not worry too much, but I am still
wary of letting it write.  Typing "git repo-config" in a freshly
initialized empty repository seems to segfault, which does not
help my confidence level either.
I fixed this error (see separate patch). This was reintroduced by 
carelessly checking argv[1] for "--list" and "-l", even if argc < 2. I am 
sorry that I did not review that patch.

I tried to make really sure that repo-config works as expected by 
introducing quite a few test cases into t1300, but evidently I forgot to 
check for things that do not usually break, like calling without 
arguments. This is fixed with the patch I just sent out.

This patch also introduces the "--get-regexp" flag to repo-config, which 
makes up for the lacking shell wildcards (you can ask questions like: 
which keys in the config end in "coatl"?).

As for the trust in repo-config writing the config: it is all done by 
calling git_config_set() or git_config_set_multivar(), which you use 
yourself to set core.repositoryformatversion, among other values.

Ciao,
Dscho
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help